NYARUMBA & ASSOCIATES

Project Delivery Management When Implementation Risk Threatens Strategic Investments

Deliver complex technology initiatives on time, on budget, and on spec through structured oversight that balances stakeholder expectations with execution realities

25+ years | Banking · Government · Agriculture | 30+ major implementations

Common Challenges in Project Delivery

Budget-Timeline-Scope Triple Threat Emerging

Your project is three months in. Initial estimates prove unrealistic. Vendor delivers half-features. Business demands full scope by original deadline. CIO faces board explaining cost overruns.

Vendor Delivers 'Working' System Nobody Will Use

IT signed off on technical specifications. Vendor demos pass acceptance tests. Business users refuse adoption—system doesn't match actual workflows. Project 'complete' but organization unchanged.

Scope Creep Disguised as Critical Requirements

Week 8: Sales requests 'simple' CRM integration. Week 12: Finance needs custom reporting. Week 16: Operations demands mobile app. Each presented as must have. Project timeline unchanged. IT team burning out.

Stakeholder Consensus Evaporates Under Pressure

Kickoff meeting: Everyone agrees on priorities. Mid-project: Marketing contradicts Operations. Finance vetoes IT recommendations. Executive sponsor goes silent. Steering committee becomes blame assignment forum.

Risk Register Becomes Post-Mortem Prediction

Project identified 'legacy system compatibility' as moderate risk. Nobody tested until integration phase. Now: 6 week delay while vendor builds custom APIs. Every risk in register materializes. Board questions planning competence.

Quality Assurance Happens Week Before Go Live

Testing scheduled for final two weeks. Bugs surface daily. Vendor claims 'configuration issues.' Business finds critical gaps. Launch postponed twice. CFO questions project governance. Quality was never independently verified.

Internal Team Lacks Bandwidth for Oversight

Your IT director manages operations plus three projects. Project manager reports to vendor account manager. Nobody validates deliverables against requirements. Realized six months in: no independent quality control. Starting from scratch.

Vendor Training Assumes Expert Users

Three-day training session. Vendor covers advanced features. Users need basic workflows. Support tickets flood helpdesk. Productivity drops 40% post launch. Vendor invoiced 'successful knowledge transfer.' Users revert to old system workarounds.

Our Project Delivery Approach

Structured process. Flexible execution. Sustainable outcomes.

01

Assess

Project Scope & Organizational Capacity

  • Requirements validation
  • Resource capacity review
  • Risk identification

02

Align

Stakeholder Expectations & Success Metrics

  • Success criteria definition
  • Change control framework
  • Communication protocols

03

Architect

Delivery Roadmap & Risk Mitigation

  • Phased delivery plan
  • Quality gates
  • Contingency strategies

04

Activate

Execution Oversight & Quality Assurance

  • Independent verification
  • Issue resolution
  • Knowledge transfer

What You Get. What You Gain.

Concrete deliverables. Measurable outcomes. Lasting impact.

Tangible Deliverables

Business Outcomes

Trusted Across Africa's Leading Organizations

BankingGovernmentAgricultureHospitalityManufacturingTelecommunications

Jared transformed chaos into controlled delivery. His independent oversight caught vendor shortcuts before they became failures. The framework survived three steering committee changes and actually kept us on schedule.

Common Questions About Project Delivery Management

How long does a project delivery engagement typically take?

6-12 months for comprehensive implementation oversight, 3-4 months for specific phase support (vendor selection, UAT coordination). Timelines adapt to your project complexity and urgency. We prioritize delivering usable frameworks quickly over perfect documentation slowly.

We typically build on existing work rather than discarding it. Prior project management attempts often fail due to inadequate governance structures, not conceptual flaws. We assess what’s salvageable, identify missing risk controls, and add the connective tissue between planning and execution oversight.

Foundational project delivery management is designed as a complete, standalone deliverable. Many clients return for phase-specific guidance (vendor negotiations, post-implementation support), but there’s no expectation of perpetual consultancy. Your delivery framework should empower your team to execute independently.

We’ve delivered 30+ major technology projects across Africa. Our approach: rigorous change control processes, proactive risk identification with mitigation plans, and transparent trade-off discussions (scope vs. timeline vs. budget). Project governance prevents surprises—stakeholders always know status and implications.

Discuss Your Project Approach

30-minute consultation. No cost, no obligation. Immediate next steps.

We respect your privacy. Your information is used solely to respond to your inquiry and is never shared with third parties.

Explore Related Services

Technology challenges rarely exist in isolation. Our integrated approach addresses interconnected needs.

CIO Advisory Services

Ground implementation in strategic technology roadmaps that align with long-term business goals

Change Management

Ensure user adoption through structured change programs that respect organizational culture

Cybersecurity Advisory

Integrate security by design into project delivery through risk-based frameworks